06AStart from the complaint
Which one am I looking at?
Thirteen symptoms is a list you read sitting down. If you are standing in water, start here instead: pick the complaint in your own words and answer two to four questions by looking at the screen already in front of you. It ends on a symptom below, and it never ends on a conclusion about the water.
06On water
What are you looking at?
Pick the symptom on the screen in front of you. Nothing here diagnoses the water — every answer is about the instrument and what it is looking through.
This only hides checks that cannot apply where you are. It never adds a conclusion.
30 revision-covered catalog entries now have model/generation-specific field branches. If the current local claim draft names one of them, it is carried here automatically. Changing this selector does not alter the saved claim or send device information anywhere.
The bottom, or the whole picture
Speckle and clutter
Something added to the picture
Returns that repeat
Where marks are drawn
The depth number
What the unit chooses to draw
The installation itself
→Cone geometry
How much water is in the beam right now
Trigonometry, not a fish model. Coverage diameter is 2 · depth · tan(θ/2), so the circle the beam paints grows with depth at a fixed multiple. This is the number that explains a mark you cannot find under you.
10.6 ft
5.3 ft
0.35×
- At 30 ft the beam paints a circle about 10.6 ft across — roughly 0.35× the depth, at every depth.
- A target can sit up to 5.3 ft to the side of the transducer and still be drawn as though it were directly beneath you.
- Return strength is intensity, not identity. Nothing about this geometry lets a screen name a species.
The angle is the maker's stated total included cone, normally quoted at −3 dB. A weaker return from outside that boundary can still paint, so treat this as the honest geometric case rather than a boundary the water respects.
Nothing checked yet. Add information to begin.
